On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:55 AM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > Your finding Nada may be a function of how you are looking for it. If > you use standard Subject/Object metaphysics, then of course you will > find nothing. In the same way that Atman cannot be found in that way. > This is one reason why Pirsig does not like that metaphysics. > However, if you look beyond that metaphysics, believe me you will find > it. Keep hunting, you will see it at at some totally random normal > time, this is called enlightenment. There is nothing special about > finding it. You will wonder why you didn't see it before since it is > so simple. It really does exist. I cannot help you since you are far > away. > > Good Luck, > Mark > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:20 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> It is still speculation and under investigation, but I cannot find anything >> INHERENTLY existing. Nada. And I'm not sure what face of Buddha you think >> I am aiming for. What do you think of the witnessing experience? >> >> >> Marsha >
Hi Mark, Far away, which everybody knows is relative, nada & "spiritual rationalism" can be found in the Diamond Sutra: neither this, nor that. It is feminine. Lila, in chapter 14, states it clearly. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
