On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:37 PM, X Acto <xa...@rocketmail.com> wrote: > ... Steve claims that it is a meaningless topic of discussion, similar > to locke. > Yet the fact remains it is a relevent topic of discussion regardless. > Especially > when we are speaking about a moral Philosophy it remains a topic for the sheer > reason that it is dissolved by the explansion of the explanation not by a > denial > of there even needing one.
I do NOT think that free will is a meaningless topic, as I've said to you a few times before. (Why do you keep saying this in spite of my denials?) What I've said is that the MOQ denies both horns of the traditional free will determinism dilemma and replaces it with Pirsig's "the extent to which" one follows DQ/sq formulation of the question of freedom. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
