if you cant
respond in a relevent way to the post.

take your DMB hate some place else 

I don't remember you or Steve mentioning anything about
the terms or meanings in a philosophical context at all either

You claim not to care yet continue to post hate regardless

and Steve claims that it is a meaningless topic of discussion, similar
to locke.
Yet the fact remains it is a relevent topic of discussion regardless. Especially
when we are speaking about a moral Philosophy it remains a topic for the sheer
reason that it is dissolved by the explansion of the explanation not by a denial
of there even needing one.


....




----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <val...@att.net>
To: moq_disc...@moqtalk.org
Sent: Sun, July 31, 2011 12:47:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Free Will



Strange, Ron, I don't remember dmb's explanation addressing compatibilism.  
Actually, I don't remember dmb presenting being much of an explanation either.  




On Jul 31, 2011, at 12:19 PM, X Acto wrote:

> 
> 
> Steve:
> Why use a term when you can be nearly guaranteed to be misunderstood
> when you use it? Who outside of the handful of people participating in
> this forum would think you were defending the capacity to respond to
> dynamic quality when you say people have free will? How is that
> shorthand helpful even around here?
> 
> Ron:
> Compatibilism in this context has been around for quite some time and believe 
>it 
>
> or
> not would be understood by more than this forum. If you do a quick search on
> the topic you find that there would not be much confusion at all in using 
> these 
>
> terms.
>  
> As Stanford encyclopedia writes:
> ".1 Free Will
> It would be misleading to specify a strict definition of free will 
> since in the philosophical work devoted to this notion there is probably
>  no single concept of it. For the most part, what philosophers working on 
> this issue have been hunting for, maybe not exclusively, but centrally, 
> is a feature of agency that is necessary for persons to be morally 
> responsible for their conduct."
>  
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/
>  
>  
> .....



___


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to