H Mark, I suppose I am picking nits in a way that matters to no one else, but I need to drop both causality and connectedness which seem both to require some intrinsic nature. At the moment I like better 'conditionally co-dependent'.
Marsha On Aug 6, 2011, at 12:15 PM, MarshaV wrote: > > Mark, > > > Simply causal? I still could wonder how anything that lacks intrinsic nature > could possibly causally connect? What kind of connection would that be? > MMK - Chapter One kind of question... > > > Marsha > > > > On Aug 6, 2011, at 11:47 AM, 118 wrote: > >> This is simply a causal connection. As such it goes from undifferentiated >> (Quality) to highly differentiated (language). Please note that language >> results in perceived Quality. >> >> Mark >> >> On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:21 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course, I could wonder how anything that lacks intrinsic nature could >>> possibly connect? What kind of connection would that be? (I can hear my >>> mother's words: "Marsha, you think too much!") Undifferentiated, and >>> non-rational, and free from assimilation, discrimination, analysis and >>> synthesis? Or seeing without anything seen? >>> >>> Boggles the thinking mind... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:56 AM, MarshaV wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> >>>> Interconnected? >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 4, 2011, at 3:52 PM, 118 wrote: >>>> >>>>> There is a way to make this, understandable. Language results from >>>>> thinking, thinking results from awareness, awareness results from >>>>> dualism, dualism results from quality, quality results from Quality, >>>>> Quality results from language. >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>> ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
