Hi Marsha, Dq is indefinable. This sets it apart from mathematical computation. A defined 1 cannot describe individuality. This places the burden for decision making on the individual making possible the exploration of an indefinable/definable principle of metaphysics placing the burden of responsibility for the judgment for actions on the individual.
In DQ/SQ the individual is a different concept from mathematical 1, hence the logic is different, and the mystical DQ/SQ is more real than the logical DQ/SQ. The certainty of the reality of DQ is explored in individuality, freewill, not determined in conceptual attribution. In that way DQ is indefinable. Laws are made to be broken in further evolution, and judgment is always necessary Imho. Joe On 8/11/11 1:40 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Mr. Pirsig stated it was unknowable, as well as indivisible and > undefinable. That would be no-thing to know and no one to > know it. As Dan said, it is best explained as what it is not. > > > Marsha > > > > On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Joseph Maurer wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> The word "unknowable" seems out of place in describing DQ, since it is a >> principle in metaphysics. This which would make metaphysics a dream >> sequence. Where's the meat? >> >> Joe >> >> On 8/10/11 11:54 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. >> > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
