Hi Ham and all, DQ undefined, SQ defined. In an evolutionary environment, the indefinable comes in different flavors so to speak.
Joe On 8/7/11 9:59 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: > You throw a monkey wrench in your analysis, however, when you insist that > reality is Quality. Quality (Value) is relative to the observer. Otherwise > we would all have the same values, and "preference" would be meaningless. > Why is it the Pirsigians don't understand this? The Value of your reality > is what you make of it. You are the supreme judge and arbiter over your > existence. Quality isn't handed to you on a stone tablet. YOU decide what > is valuable, worthy, or moral in this life. Man is the measure of all > things; if this were not so, we wouldn't be talking about values as choices > and preferences or debating whether certain kinds of behavior are moral or > immoral. The whole point of lining in a relational world is that we are > free to value it differentially. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
