On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:29 PM, MarshaV wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:13 PM, david buchanan wrote: > >> dmb says: >> [dmb interjects: the non-arbitrary, non-subjective, non-capricious >> preselection of facts is also an argument against relativism.] >> > > Marsha: > Relativism doesn't necessarily mean chaotic or random, but more dependent on > circumstances such as static quality history and the dynamics of the present > moment. >
Marsha: Not only is truth within the MoQ 'dependent on circumstance of static quality history and the dynamics of the present event' (or relative), but that relative (convention) truth can be evaluated based on the four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical structure and its usefulness. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
