Hi Marsha,
That is fine.  At least you can place yourself within context that way.  
Perhaps there is another way to look at it too.

Mark

On Oct 23, 2011, at 11:58 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Dmb,
> 
> We have been through this before in the 'Humanism' thread November 2010.   I 
> do not mean an "anything goes" absolute, ethical relativism.  Conventional 
> (static) truth is relative; relative to an individual's static pattern 
> history and the dynamics of the particular event.   Truths may be judged 
> within the MoQ based on their placement within the evolutionary, four-level, 
> hierarchical structure.  
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 2:31 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha said to Mark: 
>> 
>> I am quite comfortable with conventional (static) truth being relative.  It 
>> is a word comfortably used within Buddhism and I see no reason to reject.
>> 
>> 
>> Pirsig gives us lots of reasons to believe that truth is more than merely 
>> relative, Quality is track that guides the formation of both facts and moral 
>> truths:
>> 
>> What guarantees the objectivity of the world in which we live is that this 
>> world is common to us with other thinking beings. Through the communications 
>> that we have with other men we receive from them ready-made harmonious 
>> reasonings. ..And as these reasonings appear to fit the world of our 
>> sensations, we think we may infer that these reasonable beings have seen the 
>> same thing as we; thus it is that we know we haven't been dreaming. It is 
>> this harmony, this quality if you will, that is the sole basis for the only 
>> reality we can ever know.
>> 
>> Poincaré's contemporaries .. presumed that "preselected facts" meant that 
>> truth is "whatever you like" and called his ideas conventionalism.  ..What 
>> he neglected to say was that the selection of facts before you "observe" 
>> them is "whatever you like" only in a dualistic, subject-object metaphysical 
>> system! When Quality enters the picture as a third metaphysical entity, the 
>> preselection of facts is no longer arbitrary. The preselection of facts is 
>> not based on subjective, capricious "whatever you like" but on Quality, 
>> which is reality itself. ..To leave the impression in the scientific world 
>> that the source of all scientific reality is merely a subjective, capricious 
>> harmony is to solve problems of epistemology while leaving an unfinished 
>> edge at the border of metaphysics that makes the epistemology unacceptable. 
>> ..But we know from Phædrus' metaphysics that the harmony Poincaré talked 
>> about is not subjective. It is the source of subjects and objects and exists 
>> in an anterior relationship to them. It is not capricious, it is the force 
>> that opposes capriciousness; the ordering principle of all scientific and 
>> mathematical thought which destroys capriciousness, and without which no 
>> scientific thought can proceed.
>> 
>> From chapter 29 of ZAMM:
>> Man is not the source of all things, as the subjective idealists would say. 
>> Nor is he the passive observer of all things, as the objective idealists and 
>> materialists would say. The Quality which creates the world emerges as a 
>> relationship between man and his experience. He is a participant in the 
>> creation of all things. The measure of all things...
>> 
>> How are you going to teach virtue if you teach the relativity of all ethical 
>> ideas? Virtue, if it implies anything at all, implies an ethical absolute. A 
>> person whose idea of what is proper varies from day to day can be admired 
>> for his broadmindedness, but not for his virtue.
>> 
>> Lightning hits!Quality! Virtue! Dharma! That is what the Sophists were 
>> teaching! Not ethical relativism. Not pristine "virtue." But areté. 
>> Excellence. Dharma! Before the Church of Reason. Before substance. Before 
>> form. Before mind and matter. Before dialectic itself. Quality had been 
>> absolute. Those first teachers of the Western world were teaching Quality, 
>> and the medium they had chosen was that of rhetoric.
>> 
>> 
>> ...we advanced organisms respond to our environment with an invention of 
>> many marvelous analogues. We invent earth and heavens, trees, stones and 
>> oceans, gods, music, arts, language, philosophy, engineering, civilization 
>> and science. We call these analogues reality. And they are reality. We 
>> mesmerize our children in the name of truth into knowing that they are 
>> reality. We throw anyone who does not accept these analogues into an insane 
>> asylum. But that which causes us to invent the analogues is Quality. Quality 
>> is the continuing stimulus which our environment puts upon us to create the 
>> world in which we live. All of it. Every last bit of it.
>> 
>> Men invent responses to Quality, and among these responses is an 
>> understanding of what they themselves are. You know something and then the 
>> Quality stimulus hits and then you try to define the Quality stimulus, but 
>> to define it all you've got to work with is what you know. So your 
>> definition is made up of what you know. It's an analogue to what you already 
>> know. It has to be. It can't be anything else. And the mythos grows this 
>> way. By analogies to what is known before. The mythos is a building of 
>> analogues upon analogues upon analogues. These fill the collective 
>> consciousness of all communicating mankind. Every last bit of it. The 
>> Quality is the track that directs the train.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                         
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to