Hi Matt and All, IMHO DQ is indefinable not because it is always moving like the train analogy, but rather it is indefinable, manifesting in levels in existence, evolution.
DQ is indefinable not non-existent. In a reality of evolutionary conception, DQ remains indefinable, the metaphysical description of evolutionary order manifesting in SQ conception, reality. Evolution is indefinable, DQ, manifesting in the conception of every level. This indicates to me that there is an indefinable DQ perception for levels in existence in the conception of evolution. In conceptualizing evolution there is DQ awareness, existential levels in reality, prior to the conception of SQ existence in levels, evolution. Joe On 10/26/11 4:07 PM, "Matt Kundert" <[email protected]> wrote: > *An extrapoloation of the train analogy of ZMM might help to make > plausible my contention that one cannot go around one's SQ glasses. > If we think in those terms, the front edge of the train is DQ and > everything behind it--i.e., the train--is SQ. If we posit a person > moving about the train (don't worry about what this metaphysically > corresponds to), then the only way to get up to that leading edge is > by being right behind it, on the train. If one thinks to get around the > train to the front, the only way I can imagine doing so is to leap off > the train. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
