On Nov 23, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > [Marsha] > And I might think some are bending over backwards, due to a cultural and > personal bias, to reject a term, in its epistemological connotation, that is > in common use within an Eastern explanation . Including the term help > establish the bridge between East and West. imho. > > [Arlo] > If anything, you and DMB are having different conversations. He is using the > term as it has meaning within the discourse of the historical philosophical > conversation, and you are using the term as it has meaning to you, ignoring > every connotation of the word that doesn't fit into your desire to link the > MOQ with that term and selecting only those that do fit.
Marsha: When you wrote 'historical philosophical conversation', weren't you limiting the statement to Western-centric historical philosophical conversation? I am interested in exploring the relationship between Buddhism and the MoQ. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
