I don't know about that Arlo, it being such a good thing. How does one judge conversation? Is a good dialogue one In which no disagreement occurs? In my experience, good conversation is that which has a certain flow in a "good orderly direction". Something that goes somewhere. But the fact that you bring up the subject, long after the protagonists of theism have given up and fled, is a clue to something that must be going on in your own head.
Admit it. You miss Platt. :-) John Sent from my iPhone On Nov 26, 2011, at 2:14 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[email protected]> wrote: > [John] > The thrust of my point, concerned your concern over advocates for a view that > the MoQ is a theism. My question for you, is who the heck are you talking > about? > > [Arlo] > This is all in the archives, John, and I wasn't thinking about any one person > or persons specifically, just that this argument has been brought to the table > here several times; that it hasn't in a while is a good thing. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
