[John]
But the fact that you bring up the subject, long after the protagonists of theism have given up and fled, is a clue to something that must be going on in your own head.

[Arlo]
Apparently they have not 'fled', John.

[John]
... is a clue to something that must be going on in your own head.

[Arlo]
Only that it represents a redefinition, both of Pirsig's MOQ and the meaning of 'theism', to the point where both are distorted beyond value. I also pointed out its the same inanity that says "atheism is a form of theism", in the case of the MOQ you are saying that "anti-theism is a form of theism", which may help those in need of theism sleep at night, but does nothing for the MOQ (or theism).

[John]
Anti-theism is probably the single biggest factor In the promulgation of SOM.

[Arlo]
Since the MOQ is anti-theistic, and it opposes SOM, this statement is about as gross a misunderstanding of the MOQ as I've seen. But this just proves my point.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to