Mark,

Static patterns of value can be understood as recurrent patterns of 
interactions that arise simultaneously.  Such patterns are not objects in any 
sense, but specific, recurring relationships.  This notion aligns well with the 
Buddha's The Principle of  Conditionality: If this is, that comes to be; from 
the arising of this, that arises; if this is not, that does not come to be; 
from the stopping of this, that is stopped.


Marsha
 


On Mar 7, 2012, at 6:52 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Further, Mark, it seems you cannot understand the difference between object 
> and process?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 7:36 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> It seems you cannot understand the difference between an objective, 
>> independent existence and a relative, interdependent existence?  Well, I 
>> shall not be rushed into presenting a Tractatus, but at the very least a 
>> relative, interdependent existence will not require a primary source or a 
>> soul.     
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:55 AM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> You seem to be using your patterns as objects.  Am I wrong here?  I do
>>> not see how you are making the patterns something different.  Even
>>> objects can change, so that does not mean anything different.  It
>>> would seem that your are simply performing a word change from
>>> "objects" to "patterns".  How are they different?  We see a pattern on
>>> a rug, because it repeats itself.  That is what a pattern is.  What is
>>> it about your patterns that provides such repetition.  How is it that
>>> you undergo pattern recognition?
>>> 
>>> Just seeking clarification for my own understanding.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> On 3/6/12, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:35 AM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I find it interesting that our beloved Marsha, who has consistently denied
>>>>> her selfness, now denies her ability to form opinions, as well.  After
>>>>> reviewing Mark's analysis of her March 4 dissertation on feelings and
>>>>> their ownership, Marsha responded:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't know enough to form an opinion.  It is extremely interesting,
>>>>>> though,
>>>>>> and I hope to learn more.
>>>>> 
>>>>> One can only wonder what all those quotes posted from the Vedanta and
>>>>> Buddhist scholars are intended to express if not her opinion.  Marsha has
>>>>> certainly formulated her own opinion of what a SOM pattern is, since
>>>>> "ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and impermanent, static
>>>>> patterns of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value" has
>>>>> become the mantra that identifies her.
>>>> 
>>>> Hello Ham,
>>>> 
>>>> You must have been reading my thoughts, for I have surely been thinking
>>>> about you, and hoping you would find a way to do what you do so well.
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to comment on the term "SOM pattern".  For the expression 
>>>> seems
>>>> both true and false.  The mind does seem to have evolved to reify ALL 
>>>> useful
>>>> experience into objects of conception & perception; it is a very insidious
>>>> tendency.  I do believe my definition of static patterns helps to move 
>>>> one's
>>>> ideas about "objects" from discrete, bounded, objective entities to ones of
>>>> pragmatically formed, recursive, interdependent "patterns of value
>>>> (processes)".
>>>> 
>>>> And, yes, I have found much useful detail presented by Vedanta and Buddhist
>>>> scholars.  It often surprises me how clearly they present very difficult 
>>>> and
>>>> strange (to the Western way of thinking) ideas. But always I believe one
>>>> should continually check and verify.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to