Joe,
"``A thing exists,'' he said, ``if a world without it can't function normally.
If we can show that a world without Quality functions abnormally, then we have
shown that Quality exists, whether it's defined or not.'' He thereupon
proceeded to subtract Quality from a description of the world as we know it."
(RMP, 'ZAMM', Chapter 18)
Marsha
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi MarshaV and All,
>
> IMHO What is the base for stating that DQ is not divisible, not definable,
> not knowable, yet still experienced? It seems the "no's" have the upper
> hand over the affirmation of experience.
>
> You can't define what a thing is by declaring what it is not. You have to
> bite the bullet and accept that the indefinable can be experienced. Its
> base is consciousness.
>
> Negation, definition, non of the above, manipulate consciousness, the
> experience of reality, in indefinable/definable, DQ/SQ, metaphysics.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On 2/19/13 8:09 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dynamic Quality is not divisible, not definable and not knowable, though it
>> can be experienced.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
