Joe,

No pejorative there on my part.  


Marsha



On Mar 17, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> You use "metaphysics of the obvious" as pejorative logic.  Metaphysics is
> not vacuous.  I see a limit to mathematical logic. I prefer dialogue to
> numbers.  
> 
> In the theory of knowledge I find no place for abstraction.  Direct
> experience of hierarchical existence reveals limits to conceptualization.
> 
> I accept reality as levels in existence, evolution.  I am in favor of a
> concept of hierarchical evolutionary reality through limits to the
> hierarchical structure.  I can't jump on my horse and ride off in all
> directions.
> 
> My metaphysical education was the study of SOM.  DQ/SQ is more readily
> understood as indefinable individuality, definable reality than
> subject/object division.  DQ the indefinable manifests in evolution in
> existence of indefinable/definable reality.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/17/13 12:12 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello Joe,
>> 
>> Ahh yes, mom, apple pie, critical thinking and truth, a metaphysics of the
>> obvious!  
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 16, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/16/13 2:01 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>>> 
>>>>> If dynamic quality, reality, is unknowable why use the term?
>>>> 
>>>> Are you asking why RMP used language to explain the Metaphysics of Quality?
>>> 
>>> Hi Marsha
>>> 
>>> I guess I am stuck in questioning logic!  I do not know how to logical
>>> express the unknowable.  Perhaps through analogy, metaphor, gesture.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> There is a broad spectrum of the knowable.  What is unknowable describing?
>>>> 
>>>> Since you think it is Dynamic Quality is knowable, you describe it?
>>> 
>>> There is a difference between the indefinable and the unknowable.  I may not
>>> be able to use defined words to describe an unknowable, but I can use
>>> gesture, analogy, metaphor to achieve some meaning of indefinable reality.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Limits of reality or limits of knowledge?
>>>> 
>>>> What are you referring to and in what context?
>>> 
>>> In Moq metaphysics knowledge is communicated through analogy, metaphor,
>>> gesture for DQ as well as words and definitions of SQ.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> To discuss unknowable reality seems futile.
>>>> 
>>>> Okay.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Supposing there is a broad spectrum to the unknowable, how can we discover
>>>>> it?  
>>>> 
>>>> To say the unknowable is a 'broad spectrum' seems to be assuming too much.
>>> Metaphysics accepts the indefinable.  Music, gesture, analogy, metaphor etc.
>>> are some ways to make myself understood.
>>>> 
>>>>> It seems to me discussion and unknowable are at odds unless you accept 
>>>>> that
>>>>> indefinable and unknowable are synonymous.
>>>> 
>>>> This might be one way to think about indefinable and unknowable.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> DQ is indefinable. IMHO Unknowable reality stretches the discussion of DQ
>>>>> metaphysics to a leap of Faith.
>>>> 
>>>> It's a 'leap of faith' that when I wake up in the morning, put my feet on
>>>> the
>>>> floor and stand up that I won't fall through the flooring.  And?
>>>> 
>>>> I was trying to open the door to Faith and Reason.
>>> 
>>>>> I would rather tweak rationality into the experience of indefinable
>>>>> DQ in consciousness rather than accept indefinable DQ as a leap of faith.
>>>> 
>>>> In considering a metaphysics - the nature of reality - I would prefer to 
>>>> dig
>>>> deep rather than settle for tweaking rationality.  I might consider that
>>>> "tweaking rationality" is best handled by holding static patterns of value
>>>> as
>>>> hypothetical (supposed but not necessarily real or true).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> I don't want to abandon truth either!
>>> 
>>>> Joe 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/14/13 4:07 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Greetings Joe,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am perfectly satisfied with understanding the MoQ designating Reality =
>>>>>> Value(Dynamic(indivisible, undefinable and unknowable)/static(divisible,
>>>>>> definable and knowable))  :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Marsha 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi MarshaV,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am too old (80 plus) to remember philosophy.  I want to jump
>>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>>> to an indefinable as the limit on an aging process.  DQ is indefinable,
>>>>>>> always new, so to speak, and I am alive!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 3/13/13 11:30 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello Joe,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I wondered if you might agree with Nietzsche?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> "Compared with music all communication by words is shameless; words
>>>>>>>> dilute
>>>>>>>> and brutalize; words depersonalize; words make uncommon common."
>>>>>>>>      (Nietzsche, Friedrich,  'Will To Power')
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> re fa la
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Marsha
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi MarshaV,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> IMHO How to describe a theory of knowledge in DQ/SQ experience?  DQ,
>>>>>>>>> indefinable self-consciousness along with definable SQ structure,
>>>>>>>>> enables
>>>>>>>>> self-directed activity.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> SQ, defined reality, places the limit of definition on an indefinable
>>>>>>>>> DQ
>>>>>>>>> emotional self-consciousness.  Definitions aid communication.  Music 
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> more immediate less structured communication in its emotional origins.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What is logic?  The Intellect and freewill of activity are tied to a
>>>>>>>>> common
>>>>>>>>> limit, self-awareness.  I can't jump on my horse and ride off in all
>>>>>>>>> directions.  Logic describes limits on knowledge in the structure of
>>>>>>>>> self
>>>>>>>>> awareness DQ/SQ.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Music is an harmonious structure, more revealing in some ways in being
>>>>>>>>> less
>>>>>>>>> subject to SQ discipline than logic.  Music evokes more intensity in
>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>> indefinable emotional origins than intellectual logic.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 3/13/13 12:40 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Schopenhauer believed that the mediations of art in general, but
>>>>>>>>>> particularly
>>>>>>>>>> music, were more directly able to reveal the nature of reality than
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> philosophy.
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to