Joe, Many thanks for patiently dealing with my recent questions. I do have another one (though hopefully, this will be the last one for a while!):
How is individuality "a boundary of indefinable DQ/SQ"? (I always thought individuality was just a social convention; certainly something that couldn't put a boundary to DQ). Best wishes, Ant Joe Maurer explained March 20th: As I understand it the theory of how we know things has not kept pace with our experience. MOQ's acceptance of DQ, indefinable individuality, requires a tweak in the theory of how we know things. SOM follows one theory of knowledge, abstraction. MOQ follows a different theory of knowledge and accepts the experience of indefinable reality DQ/SQ. IMHO Individuality is a boundary of indefinable DQ/SQ. That seems to be an important consideration in a discussion of psychology that leaves me wondering how the theory of knowledge must change to accept the experience of the indefinable? How must psychology be tweaked for the metaphysical acceptance of experiencing the indefinable? Obviously I am just wool gathering. I have no answers! On 19/3/13, "Ant McWatt" <[email protected]> asked: > Secondly, I can largely follow what you're saying here Joe except for your > use of the term "individuality" in the phrase "indefinable individuality" > (especially in the context of Dynamic Quality). It's unclear to me why you > didn't use the term "reality" instead (so the term read as "indefinable > reality"). Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
