Thnx Ant, for giving me the benevit of the doubt. Believe me the last thing i want to be is a savior or a celebrity. My thought's have risen from a sort of mental survival mode in an effort to regain my sanity! The last twenty years i have seen how psychiatric pseudo science is struggling without any solid frame of reference exept for an ever expanding statistical manual that catagorizes behavior deviancies. And I believe that the solution to this problem lies in the potential of these deviancies. So in some weird way of looking is our current psychiatric science distroying potential solutions to their own problem.
2013/4/3 Ant McWatt <[email protected]> > Ant McWatt comments: > > I generally tend to have the same suspicions as Dave here. I probably > receive correspondence about the "new secret of the universe" once every > month and most of this - once you slowly go through each step of the great > new idea - through the usual evading tactics of escaping to esoteric > mathematics - is arcane nonsense. > > However, being a philosopher (rather than a philosophiologist) is - I > think anyway - about trying to keep an open, beginner's mind. So despite > the tons of bullshit that such a mind has to go through, at least there are > the occasional pearls of wisdom such as the MOQ. Moreover, reading Eddo's > last couple of posts, I do think there might be a little more than > "psychotic nonsense" to his ideas (i.e. his answer to Dave that he's using > mathematics for his philosophical system as it is the least culturally > biased "language" makes some sense; at least on face value). Anyway, it > will be interesting to see how this particular converstion pans out. > > Best wishes, > > Ant > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > dmb said April 1st: > > > > The mathematics of pure sensation? I hope this is some kind of April > Fools Day joke. > > > > > > Eddo replied April 2nd: > > If it is too confusing for your current belief system to handle, just > ask what you want me to clarify. > > > > > > dmb says: > > Okay. How does a person "strip every bit of information from every > emotion"? What does it mean to say that "pure sensation" is "what we ..are > at the most fundamental level". And, as you might have inferred already, > I'd like to know how this could be "workable in Mathematical terminology". > And why would you want to do that? > > > > Frankly, this strikes me as something a psychotic person would say. I > can make no sense of it at all. > > > > > > > . > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
