Hi Dan and All, A weakness in MOQ is the non-answer to the question <HOW DO WE KNOW?> as having priority to <what do we know>. DQ/SQ value metaphysics, accepts that the indefinable can be experienced by the individual from a metaphysical position. There has been no tweak to the theory of knowledge to explain possible responses to the indefinable in consciousness/will.
I can only allude to logic for the existence of the indefinable since I can't define it. The theory of knowledge has to be tweaked for the validation of a meaningful experience of indefinable/definable reality DQ/SQ. Logic cannot suggest the answer to existing indefinable DQ. MOQ is required. IMHO Joe On 4/23/13 9:40 PM, "Dan Glover" <[email protected]> wrote: > Exactly. Yet at the same time, there are those here who insist we as > individual subjects experience a world made up of objects. Even though > Robert Pirsig is quite clear in saying the MOQ opposes any such > notion--that the central reality of the MOQ isn't a subject or an > object--these folk continue arguing in favor of subjects experiencing > objective reality. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
