Dear Marsha

Please just meditate over one single word you write or read.
> Jan,
> 
> Though I am stupid, seeing is still an experience of now, now, now...  
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> On May 29, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> That is just a stupid thing to say Marsha.
>> 
>> Most of us here know what you have said and also what standpoint you're 
>> going to take tomorrow.
>> 
>> Concepts about time, the past and the future are high quality patterns.
>> 
>> Take it easy my dear
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jan,
>>> 
>>> You cannot see where you have been.  
>>> You cannot see where you are going.  
>>> You can only see now, now, now... 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 29, 2013, at 6:11 AM, X <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Jan
>>>> We can not see where we are going only where we have been..
>>>> 
>>>> Ron
>>>> 
>>>> Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Ron
>>>>> 
>>>>> Literally that would be like a rear-view mirror mounted on top of the 
>>>>> intellectual level? :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can take that. But no one is driving by looking into that, most 
>>>>> motorcycle riders look forward at the road, using a map to find the way, 
>>>>> to Bozeman for example.
>>>>> 
>>>>> J A Andersson
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mr Anders,
>>>>>> I think the copplestone quote sheds a little light on the subject, the 
>>>>>> one where
>>>>>> it is stated that truth is the highest intellectual pattern but..it is 
>>>>>> subordinate
>>>>>> to intellectual quality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What does that mean?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think it means that the best truths are those that support the best of 
>>>>>> the lower
>>>>>> forms of quality, excellence in mind body and environment.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That not only is the test of truth its use in the flow of experience but 
>>>>>> also its overall
>>>>>> excellence and worth to the human species as a whole.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Ron
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dear women and gentlemen
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The original question seemed to me as a kind of IQ quiz, you know, like 
>>>>>>> the series of 4 symbols that evolve in some weird pattern and there is 
>>>>>>> an empty space for the fifth that should be filled in. I like that kind 
>>>>>>> of challenges but I don't cry if I can't do it right.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What the four levels have in common is that the latter is built on and 
>>>>>>> dependant on the former, but doing it by its own purpose. Right?
>>>>>>> A fifth MOQ level should thus be based on the intellectual level but 
>>>>>>> with its own purpose.
>>>>>>> So what is the purpose of MOQ. Is it dependant on the intellectual 
>>>>>>> level? Is it just a branch of the old "New age" spirituality?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't claim that MOQ is the best and the only way to describe its 
>>>>>>> precedent levels of pattern, but to me the perspective point, the value 
>>>>>>> base for MOQ concepts, concepts ABOUT intellectual concepts, should be 
>>>>>>> found somewhere outside the intellectual level. This "About" deserves 
>>>>>>> that theres is a distance from what is observed and discussed. 
>>>>>>> Otherwise it would run into an infinite loop of intellectuality.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maybe this is just the base for Excellence, the Intellectual Quality 
>>>>>>> Experience of The MOQ Value or where do you think it is?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jan Anders
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Jan-Anders said:
>>>>>>>> In my view, MOQ  IS at the 5th level, because metaphysics is based 
>>>>>>>> "above", or "outside" the intellectual level.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> dmb says:
>>>>>>>> Metaphysics is above the intellectual level? Metaphysics is just a 
>>>>>>>> branch of philosophy. It's the area of philosophy that deals with the 
>>>>>>>> most basic questions like, "what is reality made of?" and "how can we 
>>>>>>>> have knowledge?". Why do we need a whole other level of reality for 
>>>>>>>> that? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm guessing that you take "metaphysics" to mean something that it 
>>>>>>>> does not mean. New Age spirituality, or something?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ron:
>>>>>>>> Thanks for endeavoring to clear that up Dave because I believe that is 
>>>>>>>> the core of alot of misunderstanding here.
>>>>>>>> It needs to be hammered on. The consequences of equating MoQ with 
>>>>>>>> "reality" are so great and far reaching
>>>>>>>> that it pretty much is a case of solving by redefining, you are still 
>>>>>>>> stuck in the assumption that concepts are reality.
>>>>>>>> Now some may beg to argue that concepts are reality, that static 
>>>>>>>> patterns are the flux of experience but then
>>>>>>>> we must ask how this differs from positivism. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think there are quite a few who do think metaphysics is a new age 
>>>>>>>> spirituality, this error in understanding
>>>>>>>> accounts for much of the assertions of Bodvars theories and mistakes.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This has always perplexed me that people here, on a philosophy forum, 
>>>>>>>> do not take the time nor the effort
>>>>>>>> to research what it is we are talking about, we are on computers for 
>>>>>>>> cryin out loud anyone can look up
>>>>>>>> any word or concept and instantly gain a better understanding of the 
>>>>>>>> terms and the theories as they are 
>>>>>>>> commonly understood and call them into question when used out of 
>>>>>>>> context or inappropriately.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Arlo had a point, I think some here are in it for the AA meeting 
>>>>>>>> quality and are not interested in the philosophical
>>>>>>>> aspect, that shit is too square. When somebody points out that this is 
>>>>>>>> a philosophy forum and not an AA meeting
>>>>>>>> they get shouted down as a dogmatist, dialectician, academic, SOMist . 
>>>>>>>> Any time the living philosophy aspect
>>>>>>>> of this forum emerges it gets shut down by a disagreement of the very 
>>>>>>>> basics of intellectual quality.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to