Greetings Adrie. Congratulations with your improved English/American, you sound like a genuine native and also, in this post at least, air some interesting thoughts about the MOQ.
> Pirsig played with the idea that we are in need of a fift level, the > quantum level probably, but was doubting it at the same time. He is > a writer, not a theorethical physicist. I think it was an "art" level or "code" beyond intellect Pirsig spoke about. The quantum level below the inorganic was the pet of one Doug Renselle in the very first months of the - then - Lila Squad. Before DMB had begun his destruction of the MOQ with his Jamesian "Conceptual" nonsense. > And of course , do we have to understand the fifth level on top of > the pyramid,inorganic , organic, biological,etc....or determining > the foundations of the pyramid, simply to begin with, as a level > before the inorganic?-----quality emerging from chaos?..... in this > sense, the provided article from the first link is showing a glimpse > of order emerging from chaos on a quantum-level. Of course there is a meta-level on top, below and surrounding, not only the static levels, but the complete DQ/SQ system, namely the MOQ. This is what Pirsig meant by "No one can avoid metaphysics" before he lost heart and lapsed back in SOM with the MOQ a menu about the Quality food "out there". Quality and the MOQ are synonymous. Compare it to SOM. While it ruled it being a meta-system was hidden - everyone thought the S/O was reality itself - but with Pirsig revealing its true nature as a meta-system, the spell was broken. Now we see that SOM is neither subjective nor objective but a meta-level s surrounding the S/O dualism. Likewise MOQ is neither dynamic nor static but the meta-level surrounding or containing the DQ/SQ dualism. DMB's - and the latter-day Pirsig's - fallacy is to make the MOQ an intellectual pattern. Completely insane, intellect is a MOQ pattern and for it to be contained by a subset of its own is impossible according to Pirsig's own container logic. Anyway, insisting on an "expansion of intellect" makes the 4th a mental, mind-like level and Pirsig has managed to "knock down the MOQ". Something he said was impossible (in LILA) but now he has managed to do himself. OK, I doubt you will have DMB's ear regarding this issue and - NB! - this meta-level isn't any 5th static - nor is it dynamic - but the DQ/SQ configuration itself. Unless we see the MOQ as reality, all taes place in "intellect" and that's indistinguishable from SOM. Bodvar from [email protected] to Adrie relayed to moqtalk.org Please stay on the current issue's or fade away with your dada's. 2013/5/27 <[email protected]> > Greetings Adrie. > > Congratulations with your improved English/American, you sound like > a genuine native and also, in this post at least, air some interesting > thoughts about the MOQ. > > > Pirsig played with the idea that we are in need of a fift level, the > > quantum level probably, but was doubting it at the same time. He is > > a writer, not a theorethical physicist. > > I think it was an "art" level or "code" beyond intellect Pirsig spoke > about. The quantum level below the inorganic was the pet of one Doug > Renselle in the very first months of the - then - Lila Squad. Before > DMB had begun his destruction of the MOQ with his Jamesian > "Conceptual" nonsense. > > > And of course , do we have to understand the fifth level on top of > > the pyramid,inorganic , organic, biological,etc....or determining > > the foundations of the pyramid, simply to begin with, as a level > > before the inorganic?-----quality emerging from chaos?..... in this > > sense, the provided article from the first link is showing a glimpse > > of order emerging from chaos on a quantum-level. > > Of course there is a meta-level on top, below and surrounding, not > only the static levels, but the complete DQ/SQ system, namely the > MOQ. This is what Pirsig meant by "No one can avoid metaphysics" > before he lost heart and lapsed back in SOM with the MOQ a menu > about the Quality food "out there". Quality and the MOQ are > synonymous. > > Compare it to SOM. While it ruled it being a meta-system was hidden - > everyone thought the S/O was reality itself - but with Pirsig > revealing its true nature as a meta-system, the spell was broken. Now > we see that SOM is neither subjective nor objective but a meta-level s > surrounding the S/O dualism. Likewise MOQ is neither dynamic nor > static but the meta-level surrounding or containing the DQ/SQ dualism. > > > DMB's - and the latter-day Pirsig's - fallacy is to make the MOQ an > intellectual pattern. Completely insane, intellect is a MOQ pattern and > for it to be contained by a subset of its own is impossible according to > Pirsig's own container logic. Anyway, insisting on an "expansion of > intellect" makes the 4th a mental, mind-like level and Pirsig has > managed to "knock down the MOQ". Something he said was > impossible (in LILA) but now he has managed to do himself. > > OK, I doubt you will have DMB's ear regarding this issue and - NB! - > this meta-level isn't any 5th static - nor is it dynamic - but the DQ/SQ > configuration itself. Unless we see the MOQ as reality, all taes place in > "intellect" and that's indistinguishable from SOM. > > Bodvar > > > > > > > > > > > ------- End of forwarded message ------- > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
