Jan,

You cannot see where you have been.  
You cannot see where you are going.  
You can only see now, now, now... 
 


Marsha



On May 29, 2013, at 6:11 AM, X <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jan
> We can not see where we are going only where we have been..
> 
> Ron
> 
> Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ron
>> 
>> Literally that would be like a rear-view mirror mounted on top of the 
>> intellectual level? :-)
>> 
>> I can take that. But no one is driving by looking into that, most motorcycle 
>> riders look forward at the road, using a map to find the way, to Bozeman for 
>> example.
>> 
>> J A Andersson
>> 
>>> Mr Anders,
>>> I think the copplestone quote sheds a little light on the subject, the one 
>>> where
>>> it is stated that truth is the highest intellectual pattern but..it is 
>>> subordinate
>>> to intellectual quality.
>>> 
>>> What does that mean?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think it means that the best truths are those that support the best of 
>>> the lower
>>> forms of quality, excellence in mind body and environment.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> That not only is the test of truth its use in the flow of experience but 
>>> also its overall
>>> excellence and worth to the human species as a whole.
>>> 
>>> -Ron
>>> 
>>> ..
>>> 
>>> Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear women and gentlemen
>>>> 
>>>> The original question seemed to me as a kind of IQ quiz, you know, like 
>>>> the series of 4 symbols that evolve in some weird pattern and there is an 
>>>> empty space for the fifth that should be filled in. I like that kind of 
>>>> challenges but I don't cry if I can't do it right.
>>>> 
>>>> What the four levels have in common is that the latter is built on and 
>>>> dependant on the former, but doing it by its own purpose. Right?
>>>> A fifth MOQ level should thus be based on the intellectual level but with 
>>>> its own purpose.
>>>> So what is the purpose of MOQ. Is it dependant on the intellectual level? 
>>>> Is it just a branch of the old "New age" spirituality?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't claim that MOQ is the best and the only way to describe its 
>>>> precedent levels of pattern, but to me the perspective point, the value 
>>>> base for MOQ concepts, concepts ABOUT intellectual concepts, should be 
>>>> found somewhere outside the intellectual level. This "About" deserves that 
>>>> theres is a distance from what is observed and discussed. Otherwise it 
>>>> would run into an infinite loop of intellectuality.
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe this is just the base for Excellence, the Intellectual Quality 
>>>> Experience of The MOQ Value or where do you think it is?
>>>> 
>>>> Jan Anders
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jan-Anders said:
>>>>> In my view, MOQ  IS at the 5th level, because metaphysics is based 
>>>>> "above", or "outside" the intellectual level.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> dmb says:
>>>>> Metaphysics is above the intellectual level? Metaphysics is just a branch 
>>>>> of philosophy. It's the area of philosophy that deals with the most basic 
>>>>> questions like, "what is reality made of?" and "how can we have 
>>>>> knowledge?". Why do we need a whole other level of reality for that? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm guessing that you take "metaphysics" to mean something that it does 
>>>>> not mean. New Age spirituality, or something?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>> Thanks for endeavoring to clear that up Dave because I believe that is 
>>>>> the core of alot of misunderstanding here.
>>>>> It needs to be hammered on. The consequences of equating MoQ with 
>>>>> "reality" are so great and far reaching
>>>>> that it pretty much is a case of solving by redefining, you are still 
>>>>> stuck in the assumption that concepts are reality.
>>>>> Now some may beg to argue that concepts are reality, that static patterns 
>>>>> are the flux of experience but then
>>>>> we must ask how this differs from positivism. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think there are quite a few who do think metaphysics is a new age 
>>>>> spirituality, this error in understanding
>>>>> accounts for much of the assertions of Bodvars theories and mistakes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This has always perplexed me that people here, on a philosophy forum, do 
>>>>> not take the time nor the effort
>>>>> to research what it is we are talking about, we are on computers for 
>>>>> cryin out loud anyone can look up
>>>>> any word or concept and instantly gain a better understanding of the 
>>>>> terms and the theories as they are 
>>>>> commonly understood and call them into question when used out of context 
>>>>> or inappropriately.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Arlo had a point, I think some here are in it for the AA meeting quality 
>>>>> and are not interested in the philosophical
>>>>> aspect, that shit is too square. When somebody points out that this is a 
>>>>> philosophy forum and not an AA meeting
>>>>> they get shouted down as a dogmatist, dialectician, academic, SOMist . 
>>>>> Any time the living philosophy aspect
>>>>> of this forum emerges it gets shut down by a disagreement of the very 
>>>>> basics of intellectual quality.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ..
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to