Dear all, 

Looks like this eureka moment is too much for some to handle.

>From the point of view of Eastern Philosophy, there is no denial of intellect, 
>but merely placing it in its proper place. 

But from the point of view of Western intellect, there  seems to be a great 
fear of mysticism derived from self introspection. This is its great limitation.

RMP has endeavoured to provide a place for it in the expansion of intellect by 
including Quality or Dynamic Quality in the centre of the MOQ.

However, recent discussion has been anti-mysticism and by extension 
anti-Quality, anti DQ.

One needs to rise above intellect to experience DQ. 
I have been waiting years for signs of this realisation by the discussion 
group. 

Alas. the moment there is a glimmer of this happening, the moderator wishes to 
stamp it out. 

I post occassionally from the Eastern perspective in what is practically a 
Western Forum. 

But there is no place for my views here, moderate as they are, so I will leave. 

Thank you all for a decade and more of your exchanges.

All the best.

Goodbye.
Khoo Hock Aun

Unsubscribe.
Sent by DiGi from my BlackBerry® Smartphone

-----Original Message-----
From: Horse <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:57:39 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [MD] DQ vs. Intellect?

Greetings MD-ers

###################################################
*MOQ_DISCUSS - Charter and Rules*

The MOQ_DISCUSS mailing list exists to provide a general and 
free-ranging forum for the discussion of Robert M. Pirsig's *Metaphysics 
of Quality*.

###################################################

I think much of the problem here is that MD is (and always has been) set 
up to discuss Pirsig's MoQ and not set up as Mystics 'R' Us!!
The foundation of the MoQ is an intellect centred text which requires an 
intellectual approach - to simply state that intellectual values are 
unwelcome, evil or redundant in an intellectual environment is ridiculous!

The problem, as I see it, is that approaching an intellectually centred 
discussion group from a 'mystic perspective' produces a great number of 
problems - not least of which is the apparent mystical desire to 
circumvent rationality and ignore trivialities such as definitions! What 
this produces is an 'anything goes' environment in which intellect and 
rationality are flushed down the toilet.

MD is a philosophy discussion group and as such needs to apply the rules 
of philosophy to any discussion. This requires a rational and 
intellectual approach. It also requires the use of rational definitions 
- not self-contradictory statements which support a non-intellectual 
point of view.

What I've been seeing here recently is an attempt to undermine the 
intellectual aspect of the MoQ by the inappropriate use of a 'mystical 
perspective' - and, according to the MoQ and it's author, this is just 
plain bullshit. A 'mystical perspective' (i.e. a DQ centred approach 
within an intellect centred environment) is, literally, non sense! How 
the hell do you have a discussion about that which cannot be defined? 
There is no definition of DQ - it's a logical and rational impossibility 
- and without a definition there can be no discussion!

DMB, Ron, Arlo, et alia, are doing exactly the right thing by calling 
out certain people as anti-intellectual, when they are using a 
non-existent (by definition) 'perspective' to undermine the principles 
of the environment within which they are situated. This is not a 
strawman argument, it is to prevent a self-serving attempt to undermine 
and destroy a valid approach to a philosophical system of thought.
You do not do DQ justice by destroying Intellectual patterns any more 
than you do justice to Intellectual patterns by destroying Social 
patterns where there is no threat to intellect. DQ is not being 
threatened, relegated or ignored by Intellect on MD so to use this as an 
excuse to do so is, at best, specious.


So, for those 'mystics' who wish to remain within the MD I will make 
this, initially, polite request.
Please refrain from specious arguments using a non-existent viewpoint to 
support an intent to destroy a forum which exists to discuss a 
philosophical proposition which requires an intellectual and rational 
approach. If you are unable to do so then please leave and find 
somewhere that will fit your requirements better.

Cheers

Horse

-- 

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production 
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
--- Frank Zappa

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to