Ant,
I just spent most of my day digging a 2 ton lift jack out of 3 feet of mud  
under 
interstate 95 on the east coast, in the rain. 
 
Thnx for the chuckels
 
-R
 

From: Ant McWatt <[email protected]>
To: moq discuss <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Marsha My Dear


Dave,

You're lucky to have caught me.  I was just going out for my local Klan's 
Anti-Muslim Women week.  One of my favourite times of the year!  We especially 
despise these culturally backward people who hide behind full length dress.  
Not in the West, man, no Siree, are we accepting such backward behaviour!

Anyway, as I have a spare ten minutes while I just put my head dress on...  

----------------------------------------
Dave Buchanan posted August 1st 2013:

Marsha said to Ant McWatt:
>
> I can accept that dmb has different value judgements than mine as a result of 
> our different histories and current patterns of values.
>
>
>
> Ant Mcwatt said to his dear Marsha:
>
> What you have said is true but in this context of a philosophical discussion 
> group if you just produce the occasional mystical quote then you won't be 
> making the most of your knowledge about Pirsig's work or the Discussion 
> group. ...Though you have provided some good links and references over the 
> years, I can't remember reading one of your numerous posts and thinking "Hey, 
> that's a good way of putting of that!". ...the production of quotes is very 
> static. In fact, it could be considered a form of trolling. ...Unfortunately, 
> you can't be removed from this discussion group for being boring though - in 
> future - I do hope to hear more original thoughts from the "real" Marsha than 
> these mystical quotes. I know you're relatively very well read so you could 
> do a lot more to help people new to the MOQ (and Pirsig's work in general).
>
>
>

DMB said:

It seems that you're trying to help, Doc, but you're very much missing the 
point. 

Doc McWatt says:

The point is on the top of my head dress, Boy; look up and you'll see it 
clearly!  As for missing it, I don't miss my point, I just miss my gimp suit.  
Sadly, my black boyfriend took it with him in 1972 when he left me.  That's why 
I joined the klan, Dave, I miss my gimp suit.  (Please say a prayer for me and 
ask Baby Jesus to find the Doc's gimp suit.  The Doc doesn't mean to be racist, 
he just wants his gimp suit back).

DMB said:

I dare say that you might even be making it worse. As you've construed it, 
Marsha's deployment of naked quotes is boring, unoriginal, and represents a 
lost opportunity to helpfully contribute her knowledge of the MOQ. 

Doc McWatt says:

Naked quotes...  Yeah, I know not everyone (and especially those of a sensitive 
gentle nature) can handle those naked quotes...

DMB continued:

The problem is that Marsha's quotes are irrelevant - absurd non-sequitors - and 
she uses them to evade the substance of the matter. The only honest and fair 
way to deal with this situation is to deal with the substance of the matter. 
This is exactly what Marsha refuses to do and you're not doing it either. How 
many times do I have to point out that this is a philosophical discussion 
group? How about if we discuss philosophical ideas and their relative merits? 
If we would only do what we're supposed to be doing, everyone (including you, I 
hope) would clearly see that Marsha has nothing to contribute. (I have asked 
you to examine her "original" thoughts and please explain how they are anything 
other than unintelligible gibberish. Except for Arlo, it seems that nobody has 
addressed the substance of these complaints.)

Doc McWatt says:

Funny you should say that, Mr DMB.  I was just reading St. Paul Turner's letter 
to the "UnDivine Marsha" of June 17th and it was "Spot the Dummie" time!  Was 
it St. Paul or the UnDivine Marsha?

Let's all go back and see:

Dan's bird:

> The "Dummies Guide" reference is cute.  -  I've read a number of different
> texts by Nagarjuna, and there should be nothing odd about my accepting a
> static pattern as a mirage.  I'm sure you probably read Jay Garfield's
> translation/interpretation of the MMK.  While he's not the Buddha or
> Nagarjuna, he might illuminate the use of mirage...


St. Paul:

I'm glad you saw the humour there but I've stopped laughing and now I feel
like the Dummie because Nagarjuna is indeed translated as using "mirage" in
MMK.  I do like Jay Garfield.  I've only read a couple of essays and his
analysis of the MMK.  I haven't read the book you quote from below. 


Who's looking the Dummie now? (Remember, I haven't had my gimp suit on for 41 
years so it ain't me). 


DMB continued:

What reason do we have to believe that Marsha understands anything about the 
MOQ? And surely there is a difference between reading a lot and reading well. 
As far as I can tell, she has never understood anything I've ever said, never 
got the point of anything and never given a proper answer to any criticism. 

Doc McWatt says:

She's teasing you Boy!  Don't fall for it.  (This is the type of thing that can 
happen when someone doesn't have a gimp suit.  They have to make-up their own 
different type of... "private entertainment").


DMB continued:

This is irresponsible and dishonest. It's disruptive. It's produces nothing but 
hostility, confusion and distraction. But as you've construed it, Marsha has 
only hidden her secret intellectuality by using the wrong style! Seriously, 
what reason is there to think she understands the MOQ? I don't see any evidence 
of that. I believe that when I see it.

Doc McWatt says:

That makes two of us though not many people can say they've made St. Paul feel 
a Dummie at Discuss.  However, if Dan's girl can do that in the context of Jay 
Garfield (one cool cat) then who knows regarding Captain Bob's MOQ! 


---cut---


DMB concluded:

Gender is a totally bogus reason to retain an incompetent troll and I hardly 
think Connecticut counts as a different culture. C'mon, Doc. Now you're being 
silly.

The MOQ's moral codes say that social and biological values should not be 
allowed to interfere with intellectual progress, right? What do you suppose 
that means with respect to this discussion group? I think it means that one's 
merit is measured by basic intellectual standards, at least. And we hope that 
is done artfully. But simply refusing to do it at all? I think that's obviously 
not acceptable.


Doc McWatt ends on a high (no smoking now kids!):

A quoteless Dan's girl will either raise her game or drop like a stone. 

I've
seen the books, the Art, the cool cats.  Me and the cats even had to compete
for the bed.  Cary Grant had a big cat problem in Connecticut too but unlike me 
he didn't have my Little Richard CD collection with him 
(way too cool for the average cat!).

Peace and love and all that,

The Doc


.                         
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to