I for one, am glad Marsha is atleast adhereing to some sort of Buddhist understanding where before she even rejected Buddhism for being male dominated. I mean, she's a fukn contrarian for christ sake, she rejects stuff just because someone accepts it not for any intelligible reason but just to go against whatever any one else says or believes. By rejecting just for rejecting's sake and for no other discernable cause or reason is meaningless and useless on a philosophic discussion forum. It's just distracting noise aim at the disruption of any meaningful dialog. Its a shouting down of its own of anything meaningful. Its like going to see the philharmonic and you have some asshole in the third row blasting death metal from a boom box. Not like I dont appreciate slayer but it's not the time or place its just down right rude and thoughtless of others and what you are saying is you would defend that assholes right to blast deathmetal at the symphony. Wouldnt that make you just as much of a rude thoughtless asshole? ..
From: Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Marsha My Dear And specifically on Marsha being "boring" .... I've made the point before several times myself. Marsha sticks to her Buddhist guns like a cracked record, not because she's "stuck" in her ways, but because she's reacting to the scientistic ideologues stuck in / sticking to their ways. Nature. Until things change, I defend her right to do so. Ian On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > With Ant having defused the DMB response with humour perhaps we could > get back to the point. > > I too winced a little at the rather patronising "Marsha My Dear" > headline, but hey, it's really tough to make a difficult point on this > forum these days, a point that doesn't fit the "accepted MD ideology" > - and you have to start somewhere. Well done Ant for making the > effort. I've tried and get roundly shouted down by the baying mob of > Pirsig bulldogs. > > The point is balance. > Any evolutionary ecosystem, any democracy, needs to defend it's > minority interests. > > Most shocking was Dan's "what difference does it make ... " line. [shakes > head] > Pirsig and "them pesky redskins" working title for Lila - hello? > > Even after we've had Paul pointing out the two contexts within the MoQ > we still get one shouting down the other. If we can't handle that gawd > 'elp us add with every gender / national / racial / cultural / > cognitive-style / metaphysical perspective variation. > > Nice try Ant, and thanks for being a sport Marsha, we know you don't > actually need our help, but when Khoo left in the circumstances he > did, I really hoped the bulldogs might have had an epiphany. > > Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
