> [Ian]
> ... not allowing a narrow SOMist (Context 2) view of intellect to dominate.
> 
> [Arlo]
> I read this, and I think I cried a little. 
> 
> Let's start with Paul's basic definition of "context two". 
> 
> "Context (2) is the articulation of a particular intellectual static pattern 
> - the 'plain of understanding' - of the MOQ." (Turner, 2013)
> 
> How in the hell do you move from this to saying that context two is "a narrow 
> SOMist view"? Are you, like Bo, so hung up in the idea that intellectual 
> patterns are ipso facto "narrow SOMist" that even the articulation of the MOQ 
> becomes "SOMist" by virtue of being an intellectual pattern?
> 
> And let's keep in mind what I consider to be a key statement in Paul's paper: 
> "the first context is not so much left behind as providing the 
> epistemological basis for the second, more ontological context." (Turner, 
> 2013)
> 
> So even if we say that "context two" is about acting in the world 
> (pragmatically) AS IF we are experiencing pre-existing patterns, THIS IS NOT 
> SOM! SOM is the position that subject and objects ARE primary, and this is 
> profoundly different. In context two- informed by context one- we are able to 
> act in a high quality way, but not reproduce the mistake made in an SOM view.
> 
> As Paul concludes, "It is my view that, with the two contexts combined as 
> phases within its overall development, the MOQ enacts a major expansion and 
> evolution of the modern Western mythos." (Turner, 2013)
> 
> No where is this paper do I find any support for the idea that 'context two' 
> is 'a narrow SOMist view'.
> 
> I realize I'm quoting quite a bit, but given your comment and your 
> implication that it aligns with Paul's paper I think its worth it. So one 
> final quote.
> 
> Context two is "pragmatic high quality explanations of how the world operates 
> in accordance with the assumption that values are the ubiquitous, empirical 
> element of an evolving universe." (Turner, 2013)

[djh]
Beautifully put Arlo.  Context 2 is Not SOM.  This is one of the great things 
about Paul's Paper - we can say so much in so few words.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to