[Case] So far so good although I do not think our ideas about the nature of space/time are all that similar. As I have stated several times I do not regard the future or the past as fixed in space or time. I see the present or NOW as a "point in time", or as Euclid might phrase it; that which hath no duration. In this point in time all probability wave functions collapse to 100%. All points in time forward and in reverse of that instant have probability functions that vary as they move closer to or farther away from the present. Now the biggest object I have heard yet to this notion has to do with the fact that But no one here has raised this objection and I do not know how seriously it damages my position.
Whitehead's explanation of process and "occasions" or "events" is very similar to what I have in mind. Case, "the rate of time varies with motion and is not constant throughout the universe." interesting point. Time is effected by gravitational mass. By that, the theory of relativity doesent work. Unless, it applies Only to independent bodies of mass and is not something which is synchronized universally, therefore Time will work as you explained but on an independent basis. Time does not exist where mass and energy are not. We need to have a better grasp on the fabric of space to get any real answers on This one. But it does kinda shoot a hole in the big bang idea of the progression of a uniform time line. -Ron moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
