[Platt]
I can see this conversation is going nowhere. I never said the cells respond to
DQ.

[Arlo]
I asked, "When did single animals lose their ability to respond to DQ?". And
you replied, "It was when animals became static patterns."

I don't understand the statement "animals lost their ability to respond to DQ
when they became static patters". Are you saying there was a time when an
animal was NOT a static pattern? 

Let me try the original question again.

Was there ever a single animal that could respond to DQ?

What is an example of something it could do "then" (when it could respond to
DQ) that it can no longer do?

When you respond to these, here are two more.

Could ALL single animals at one point in time respond to DQ? Was it only
particular "species"? Or only certain individuals within a species?

Did all animals lose their ability to respond to DQ when "man" popped up? If
no, why? If so, how?

[Platt]
And if you think the wind and tide respond to DQ -- well, we will never agree
because the wind and tides are going nowhere from an evolutionary perspective.

[Arlo]
Would you say that evolution has completely stopped on all levels except for
"man" (his intellect, not his biological body)? Speculate, has it stopped
everywhere in the universe? Could you envision the possibility that evolution
is still occurring on either the inorganic or biological (or social) levels
somewhere? In other words, is it just "on earth" that all evolution has
stopped? Or has it stopped everywhere? (Again, just asking for you to speculate
based on your view)



moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to