[DM]
I meant ZMM of course. But if you fancy a change try Bishop Berkeley or
Whitehead's Process & Reality for explanation of why the subject object
language is optional and questionable.
[Ron]
Oh, sarcasm. thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Perception,evolution and the spirit
>
>
> Ron said:
>> Subject/object perception can not be "dropped" like a unstylish hand
>> bag.
>> Anyone who thinks they do not percieve in terms of subjects and
>> objects is fooling themselves.
>
>
> I know a good book you should read.
>
> DM
>
>
> [Ron]
> Do tell, I could use a good read. Thanks!
>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
