[Ron]
> That life may be summed up in a spawning salmon
> analogue that which
> fights up stream againt the roar
> Of dynamic quality stay static long enough to spawn,
> let the flow of DQ
> take you and you decay back to
> DQ itself. Thoughts? Or am I getting alittle kooky.
Ron, but what is decay other than another's
cherry blossom!
During this sq and dq discussion, thus far,
between Akshay and you (Ron) I noticed that sq and dq
were being discussed without treading too close to
'yin and yang' divisions. It was more directed at the
whole picture, it seemed, and then with this defining
of dq as growth and change, which I agree with to a
certain degree, then the inevitable happened. Ron,
you brought up, "What of decay?", and there is where
growth was delineated from decay, but I do have to
point out that, Ron, you did manage to sustain decay
as dq, and also you still maintain that dq is growth,
so, thus far, dq hasn't slip into rigid distinctions
of it must be 'this or that' a strict 'yin or yang',
but a soft duality is still sustained as dq is growth
and decay!
By the way Ron, your quoting and explaining using
Dewey and tiny comparison of Pierce with Pirsig, as
well, was very, very informative and truly did help!
Thanks.
back from Minister Creek, Arlo and Ron you two live
near that place,
It is one of the best trails I've ever been
backpacking upon,
Goin' canoein' and fishin' today on the Allegheny
River between Buffalo Creek and Crooked Creek where
Glade Run and Kiskiminetas River also partake,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
