At 08:00 AM 6/1/2007, you wrote: >Marsha, >How is curtosy unfair? How is discussing a topic >with differing views without resorting to belittlement >unfair? It's unfair to those who can not have a discussion >without their weapons. If you feel this is baloney that's >fine, I however do not. Or by your reasoning should I >tell you to go to hell, that would not be very Productive >and would not further the conversation it would only offend >you. If you favor sarcasm belittlement and abuse then >fine I just ask that you Leave me out of it. That's all. If >you can not communicate with me civily Then do not >communicate with me at all. > >Sincerely >Ron
Ron, How is apple pie and motherhood unfair? Are you going to be the monitor who determines what is sarcasm and what is acceptable discussion? Maybe your interpretation is biased by your sensitivity? I am sensitive to your insecurity. I seem to be the only women who is insane enough to express their imperfect opinion of this list. I consider no reply to be unwritten sarcasm withheld because I'm a women. That may be true, or not true. But it's my problem. My reaction is my problem. Also, sarcasm may reflect the conflicted feelings of the writer. Who's to say? Personally, I'd rather have a free flow of ideas, warts and all. If that means I get a pie in the face, so be it. It's: "Sticks and stone may break my bones, but names can never hurt me." And who's to say where the next big idea will come from, or how it will be packaged. And, I am not going to keep a file of your likes and dislikes. As I stated earlier, it's about the free flow of ideas, not Ron Kulp, or Marsha Valkyr. If you think someone's sarcasm is going to hurt you, don't read their posts. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
