> > [Platt previously]
> > > There needs to be a balance between Dynamic and
> > > static with the emphasis on
> > > maintaining a fulcrum of opportunity that allows
> for tipping in the direction
> > > of the Dynamic. (Hope the metaphor works.)
[SA previously]
> > Reality is static quality with dynamic
> quality. There doesn't need to be this - there is
this. It
> is society and intellect that are not open to this
> when degenerate process are at work. So, what have
I
> said? All generalities.
[Platt]
> Balance with openness to DQ is the ideal.
There are no ideals - just is's.
> > [Platt]
> Right. The role models for today's female teenagers
> are Madonna, Britney and
> Paris -- a sure sign of Quality decline. But I'm
> glad your agree with Pirsig's
> insight that celebrity is a unifying force,
> particularly useful in today's
> culture where political divisions are far apart and
> arouse strong passions
> (see Arlo's posts). In other words, I agree with
> your comments.
As long as political divisions do not use the
intellectual level, then the celebrity will gain more
and more power. For now, politics doesn't engage
celebritiness, in the sense that those that are more
popular with more people such as Hilton and Rosie
O'Donald will not be voted into congress - thank
goodness.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
that gives answers, not web links.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
