Quoting MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 06:33 AM 7/3/2007, you wrote: > > > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070702/foia-lawsuit-dismissed/ > > > > > > >What do you see in the court's decision that is against individual liberty? > > Platt, > > "The judge, who reviewed government descriptions of the classified > material, agreed with government arguments that the departments > didn't have to turn over the papers for reasons including protecting > the confidentiality of how the United States gets it intelligence > information." > > Protecting the Administrations (Conservative) source of intelligence > information when it was gotten illegally and without > oversight. Where is the sense that the individual can feel his/her > liberty is being protected? > > Marsha
Hi Marsha, I see this as protecting the individuals who supply the government with intelligence information needed to defend the country against its enemies who would deny liberty to everyone. Incidentally, I would hardly call the present administration "conservative," especially in light of its recent support of amnesty for illegals. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
