I also used Excel because of its ease.  Originally, I started out with an
author column, but deleted it in interest of getting done in time.  (I found
out in May we were getting a bookroom and I selected, ordered, checked in,
organized, shelved, etc. before school started in August).  Since that time,
I have regretted deleting the author column.  It is more important to have
the author at the upper levels, but it's handy to have when you needed it.)
 I created multiple columns for "tags" such as "diaries" and "Civil War" and
"mentor texts" and "fiction" so it could be sorted (filtered) in multiple
ways.  This was 5 years ago, so I'd hopefully do some work with Google docs
now.  Ours has columns for level (which I ended putting in the far left
column, had to experiment a bit), title, publisher, (used to include
copyright, now don't necessarily), and content and genre information.
 Initially, I included word count (as do Fountas and Pinnell) but abandoned
that because it wasn't appearing to be profitable.  Each teacher has a
notebook with the inventory, which hasn't proven to be profitable across the
board; most people prefer to just search the database.  Or, often, to have
me search the database.  Some teachers used their notebook inventory,
though, to highlight books and take notes for their future info.  With
Excel, you can search by level and content and get the books listed
alphabetically.  It's just pretty handy.  I also have a notebook with the
most current inventories in the leveled library.  Those are used fairly
often, but not as often as the online database.  I have a section in the
notebooks with books by level, one with books by title, one with books by
content, one with professional books, one with media, one with big books,
one with collections and kits, etc.

Our books are shelved by level.  The books are banded together by title and
placed in a tub labeled with the location, such as A-3, which would mean
books at Fountas and Pinnell's A level, in the 3rd tub of level A.  We tried
different solutions.  While plastic bags are handy for teachers (and don't
rot like rubber bands), they slip and slide and are just a royal pain.  The
tubs are color coded by level, so if you grab a red tub, you know it'll be a
Level L, etc.  The shelves where the tubs sit are also labeled with a large
bold label, such as C-5.  By having the books in tubs, it's easy for a
teacher to check out an entire tub, which happens most often in the early
primary grades, rarely above level H or so.  We have formica chips with
teachers' names on them to leave on the shelf where a tub goes, so if a
teacher takes an entire tub, it's easy for everyone else to see where those
books are without having to paw through the checkout notebook.  A tub will,
of course, be checked out longer than individual titles.

Our checkout notebook is divided by teachers' names.  The columns are: level
of book, title of book, location of book (such as L-4), number of books
checked out, and number of books checked back in.  The first year, I also
had a comment section so the teachers could note what they wanted to
remember, but only 2 teachers commented, so I lost that column.  By the way,
we also went back and forth with how to mark the books, so that they would
be really easy to reshelve.  Dots peel off, Sharpie rubs off eventually.
 But we are now doing all Sharpie marking (such as L-1) and asking teachers
to re-Sharpie if it's almost rubbed off.  That makes it very fast to
reshelve because the location is right on the book.  All you have to do is
rubber band and stick back in the tub.  We've had varied luck with
reshelving smaller numbers of books, as opposed to all books of a title.
 Some teachers are very conscientious about finding the other copies of the
book, rubber banding them together, and returning to tub.  Unfortunately,
some teachers just kind of look at the M-1 or whatever and kind of toss
whatever they have in the tub.  Two columns that are absolutely necessary is
the # of books out and the # of books in.  Often teachers will think they've
brought all the books back and find out that they're missing 1 or 2 copies
of a title.  It's easier to look if less time has gone by.

It's important to note that not all the books checked out in our leveled
library are for guided reading.  Some of them are, of course.  Some of the
mid- to upper-levels are checked out for literature circles.  Some are for
individual choice during a unit such as Space or Rocks and Minerals or
Colonial Times.  And many are checked out for book boxes a la Sharon
Taberski.  I will say, we probably have a much higher per-pupil ratio of
titles than some schools do.  I was able to negotiate some really good deals
when I ordered $60,000 worth of books.  So we have enough titles to use for
book boxes as well as guided reading.  The teachers simply checks books out
at a child's independent level for book boxes.  Of course, that use is what
results in temporarily lost books the most, so that's when it helps if a
teacher starts digging at point of check-in rather than months later.

Our big books are not housed in our leveled library.  Our inventory is split
six ways and the starting location for the big books is listed in our
inventory.  At the end of the year, the big books are all returned to where
they started, but through the year, they are pretty fluid, floating among
several classrooms.

I check out the professional books in a different notebook just for my
personal preference.  Either they are checked out by me to the teacher (if I
happen to be around at the time) or the teacher leaves a sticky note with
what she's taken, and I record it in my notebook.  I'm basically the only
person that writes in that notebook and it's right on my desk at all times.
   In reality, most of the time people check out professional books when I'm
there because they want to ask for my recommendations or opinions.

We have no time limit on any materials we have, but if the length of keeping
something causes a problem for someone else, we address it with the people
involved.

When I get to my other computer, I have a pix or two of the leveled library
shelves and I'll post it.

What would be so much simpler and better is if the books could be barcoded,
but we were hurrying at the initial setup and now we have no money to buy
the stuff.  I can't remember what the system is called that people on list
often used but I think Michele T. from Iowa first posted about it.

I should also mention that our classroom books are in baskets facing front
as is often presented in this list serv.  (Great pix on Beth Newingham's
site)  They are put into baskets using a method logical to the children and
guided by the teacher.  What a difference an arrangement makes!  I use the
same book placement arrangement in the leveled library through about Q when
I ran out of tubs, and I can tell you that the teachers HATE it when it
changes to typical spine out arrangement.  It's so much harder to examine
the books quickly to see what you need.  At earlier levels, you can just
flip through the titles quickly because the books are all facing you.

I have examples of my forms on my other computer, but I don't think they'd
be a big thrill for anyone.  You basically all have different needs and can
create your own forms to meet those needs.  I did write this, though, so
you'd see some of the right steps and the wrong steps we took in our
journey.  I can also tell you that the shelving issue is always a tightrope
walk.  If the literacy coaches (or any one person) are the only ones that
re-shelves, it's a burden for them, and isn't the best use of their time.
 But if the lit coach is really hard-nosed and never helps someone out with
re-shelving (or pulling, for that matter), it will seem like too much of an
inconvenience for the busy classroom teachers and they will be far less
likely to use the resources to their fullest.

The other issue I haven't figured out how to deal with is a way to get busy
teachers to "browse" the books so they best know what we have and can use
the resources.  I have been pretty rigid about pulling books because I truly
don't know what would be good for their particular needs.  "Grab a bunch of
L books, will ya?" just doesn't work well for anyone.  But even when I
"make" them pull their own books, everyone cruises in at 100 miles an hour
and quickly and efficiently grabs what they need (usually what they've used
before) and is out without ever seeing the things that might be even better.
 I've tried various things like scheduling each grade level for a 7:00 to
8:00 Muffin Open House or demonstrating how I pull books for The
Revolutionary War to the fifth grade teachers, but nothing has seemed to
work well enough to suit me.  I'm sure there are title after title that have
never been used.  That also happens when the science or social studies
curricula change.  Books the 4th grade once needed on 6 Native American
tribes are not used as often when their curriculum has changed to using only
2 tribes with a strict compare and contrast between those 2.

The other leveled library problem with books we have is probably universal.
 It is REALLY hard to find upper level books that are written for elementary
(not middle school) readers.  I carefully selected a lot of fiction our
second year, going through reviews, etc. and ended up with several books
inappropriate for most of our readers.  And it's an especially expensive
mistake when you buy 8 books instead of 1, like you would in a classroom.  I
wish someone like Choice Literacy would collect a bib of titles written at
high levels, but for younger children.  I don't really have the expertise or
time to do it.

The last thing I wanted to say about our leveled library is that it's
disproportionately nonfiction.  That's partly because we have lots of
multiple copies of fiction housed in classrooms, and partially because when
people requested materials the first year we established the library, they
often requested them by content units, and those were often science and
social studies.  When the money dried up to add books, I wasn't able to
continue adding in fiction to make it a better balance of books.

I'm sure this is a lot more than you wanted to know.  So...now I'll answer
the one question.  We use Excel!

Bev

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:14 PM, EDWARD JACKSON <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I used excel spreadsheet (Micosoft Word).  We also linked the nonfiction to
> content standard threads, so if you were looking to support unit study, you
> could search by content standard. Here is the trick. Set up you page for a
> spreadsheet as you normally would, labeling each column, setting width and
> so on. Then highlight that first row across the top, where all your headings
> are, and go to tools. Under tools, click on auto filter. It will now allow
> you to organize all data using filters it establishes automatically. You
> can, for example, narrow it to one level and the do a second search by
> author or by content standard. Easy.
>
>
> Lori Jackson M.Ed.Reading Specialist
> Broken Bow, NE
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:11:00 -0400
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] ***SPAM*** RE:  Book Room
> >
> > "I had developed a searchable data base by publisher, series, author,
> > etc."
> >
> > What program did you use for the database?  Thanks!
> >
> > Kendra Carroll
> >
> >
> > Email Disclaimer: Please be advised that the contents of this message
> > and any reply may be subject to disclosure under North Carolina law.
> > This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
> > information that may be privileged, confidential, or copyrighted under
> > applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > formally notified that any use, copying, or distribution of this
> > communication, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please
> > advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message
> > and any attachments without retaining a copy. This communication does
> > not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for
> > direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mosaic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> >
> > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
>
>


-- 
"There is nothing so unequal as equal treatment of unequals."    Chief
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to