why do you removed Arinudh Sj? http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Movement_roles%2FMeeting_2012-03-29&diff=3531854&oldid=3514013 _____ * *
*[image: Inline images 1]* *Béria Lima* * * * Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano.* *Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho.* <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>** * ** <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 3 March 2012 04:06, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear list, > > We have a number of people who will join for a MR meeting in Berlin. > > I suggest a Thursday afternoon session to discuss movement roles, and > a brief joint discussion with ChapCom -- we can see if they have time > for a joint session just before lunch. > > Please help edit the proposed agenda, and encourage friends and > colleagues to join if available.: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Meeting_2012-03-29 > > SJ > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> What I definitely think is that the movement roles meeting on Thursday > >> should not be a back door to join the chapters conference. There is a > >> limitation of participants and it is up to the chapters to define such > >> general conditions for their meeting. We need to discuss this with the > >> program organizer Harel (in Cc) and only if there is space for MR, those > >> who are not representatives of chapters or Foundation should join the > >> general meeting. (That's a personal opinion, not discussed with anyone > >> before.) > > > > I agree with this - we would have to ask the organizers if MR > > participants can join the chapters meeting as observers. I also agree > > with Lodewijk (below) that there should be an annual process for > > people who are not chapters reps to be invited, due to their related > > work or other relevance to the agenda. > > > > SJ > > > > Lodewijk writes: > >> If movement roles (the topic, not the group) is a significant part of > the > >> agenda, and adding someone who has now quite some experience > >> thinking about that topic would be helpful and not too costly - I think > > < it would be a good idea... because the expertise would be helpful. In > >> general I think it would be good if the organizers (hint to Harel to add > >> to considerations next year!) would consider in the future to add some > > < 'expert' non-representative slots when topics on the agenda ask for > that. > > > > -- > Samuel Klein identi.ca:sj w:user:sj +1 617 > 529 4266 > > _______________________________________________ > Movementroles mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
