On clerking: > of the X people who went ahead without ever being formally encouraged to so and registered for the conference > with MR as the justification, who is WMDE as a host going to reject and who to accept?
Can you add anyone who has registered that way to the list on Meta? (leaving blanks where unknown): http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Meeting_2012-03-29 > May I suggest that Sj specify who he thinks is important enough to the process so as to > bring him in specially for that - and then WMF and WMDE will need to decide if they > want to fund this. Let us settle details of the MR session on this list, and who plans to attend, and I will get back to you in a couple of days. We had not planned to fly people in; those who can come will be welcome. And if we make this an afternoon session, I expect we will again have participation from other attendees to the chapters meeting. Thank you for all of your help in organizing the conference this year. Theo10011 writes: > This has been ongoing for over an year... is it unreasonable to suggest that the conclusion involve some internal consensus? That is quite reasonable. A consensus online, I think; not in person. We will not be able to get all of the active participants together in a room, and as Anirudh notes, this process will take more than a short day's discussion. SJ
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
