On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Bishakha Datta <[email protected]>wrote:
> Comments inline, > Bishakha > > I also support this observation made on this list: > > Harel: "My personal take here: have a meeting of MR people who are > already at the > > conference, and that's it. I find it rather difficult to justify paying > from > > donors' money for more people on top of that, for one more meeting in a > > process that's basically approaching its final stage." > > So I too would be in favour of a small meeting on Thursday 29 March, the > day before the official conference begins, with those who are present and > can attend, or need minimum additional support to attend this - rather than > bringing in individuals specially for this. > I feel that there couldn't be a better way of spending donor money than having appropriate representation during a concluding meeting on the Movement roles project, a group which has played a significant role in generating series of movement-wide conversations. Like Beria says above, a meeting without proper representation cannot be said to represent the views of the group as a whole. In fact, we would require more than a single day to effectively conclude the discussions around this project, so that we can properly convey our ideas and thought-processes involved to the participants at the WM Conference. > > _______________________________________________ > Movementroles mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles > >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
