On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I definitely think is that the movement roles meeting on Thursday > should not be a back door to join the chapters conference. There is a > limitation of participants and it is up to the chapters to define such > general conditions for their meeting. We need to discuss this with the > program organizer Harel (in Cc) and only if there is space for MR, those > who are not representatives of chapters or Foundation should join the > general meeting. (That's a personal opinion, not discussed with anyone > before.) I agree with this - we would have to ask the organizers if MR participants can join the chapters meeting as observers. I also agree with Lodewijk (below) that there should be an annual process for people who are not chapters reps to be invited, due to their related work or other relevance to the agenda. SJ Lodewijk writes: > If movement roles (the topic, not the group) is a significant part of the > agenda, and adding someone who has now quite some experience > thinking about that topic would be helpful and not too costly - I think < it would be a good idea... because the expertise would be helpful. In > general I think it would be good if the organizers (hint to Harel to add > to considerations next year!) would consider in the future to add some < 'expert' non-representative slots when topics on the agenda ask for that. _______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
