As you can see in the edit history, the name was remove by Anirudh himself: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Movement_roles%2FMeeting_2012-03-29&diff=3527128&oldid=3514228
No dia 3 de Março de 2012 12:54, Béria Lima <[email protected]> escreveu: > why do you removed Arinudh Sj? > http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Movement_roles%2FMeeting_2012-03-29&diff=3531854&oldid=3514013 > _____ > * > * > > *[image: Inline images 1]* > > *Béria Lima* > > * * > > * Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter > livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano.* > > > > *Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho.* <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>** > > > > > > > > * > ** <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* > > > On 3 March 2012 04:06, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> We have a number of people who will join for a MR meeting in Berlin. >> >> I suggest a Thursday afternoon session to discuss movement roles, and >> a brief joint discussion with ChapCom -- we can see if they have time >> for a joint session just before lunch. >> >> Please help edit the proposed agenda, and encourage friends and >> colleagues to join if available.: >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Meeting_2012-03-29 >> >> SJ >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> What I definitely think is that the movement roles meeting on Thursday >> >> should not be a back door to join the chapters conference. There is a >> >> limitation of participants and it is up to the chapters to define such >> >> general conditions for their meeting. We need to discuss this with the >> >> program organizer Harel (in Cc) and only if there is space for MR, >> those >> >> who are not representatives of chapters or Foundation should join the >> >> general meeting. (That's a personal opinion, not discussed with anyone >> >> before.) >> > >> > I agree with this - we would have to ask the organizers if MR >> > participants can join the chapters meeting as observers. I also agree >> > with Lodewijk (below) that there should be an annual process for >> > people who are not chapters reps to be invited, due to their related >> > work or other relevance to the agenda. >> > >> > SJ >> > >> > Lodewijk writes: >> >> If movement roles (the topic, not the group) is a significant part of >> the >> >> agenda, and adding someone who has now quite some experience >> >> thinking about that topic would be helpful and not too costly - I think >> > < it would be a good idea... because the expertise would be helpful. In >> >> general I think it would be good if the organizers (hint to Harel to >> add >> >> to considerations next year!) would consider in the future to add some >> > < 'expert' non-representative slots when topics on the agenda ask for >> that. >> >> >> >> -- >> Samuel Klein identi.ca:sj w:user:sj +1 617 >> 529 4266 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Movementroles mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Movementroles mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles > >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
