> >In order to make this group keep traffic away from dev groups, it has to
> >be very "catchy". m.users isn't.
>
> No argument, I thought it was mozilla.users.general and
> mozilla.users.wishlist?
It is.
> Not really. The best policy is to be consistent, at the moment it
> isn't. Some NS6 questions get answered, some don't, the difference between
> them is puzzling. Either no NS6 get answered or they all do. Preferably,
> none of them because this isn't the right forum for them.
Indeed. Gerbil was doing great work on pointing people somewhere else, but
the luser-generated stress seems to have got to him recently ;-)
The thing is, people who answer NS6 questions think they are being
"helpful", but they aren't, really. After all, "you can't give them what
they want - it only encourages them" ;-)
> Its still important though to empower the users, perhaps Beonex can host a
> Bugzilla?
Indeed. It should do. The changes to allow bug import and export from and
to Bugzilla were made because distributors of Mozilla-based distributions
could then host their own Bugzillas and move bugs back and forth as
appropriate.
We also need a "Derivatives/Beonex" component.
Gerv
