[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> >JTK wrote:
> >>
> >> "Justin H." wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> > So obviously there's other factors besides just Mozilla's mem usage.
> >>
> >> Obviously. What are they?
> >
> >I don't know. It's your computer, you tell us.
> >
>
> Unless my sarcasm meter is faulty, you imply below ("Or did you already know
> that?") that my numbers may have been less than "uncooked". To make such an
> implication, I would think you'd have to have some idea what these "other
> factors" might be.
>
> You claim to not know. Ok, let me postulate then: what OS are you on? How
> much memory do you have? I'm Why2K, PIII-933/256MB/40GB. Numbers coming
> from Why2K's Task Manager. Now show me yers.
Concerning your sarcasm meter, I assumed you knew there were other
factors because you seem to be an intelligent person with more than your
basic user level ability with computers. I had to assume because you
aren't saying. :-)
My computer here is a Win98 SE/Celeron 500/128MB/3GB. Numbers are from
TaskInfo2000. A program that I learned about in one of the mozilla
newsgroups - can't remember which one. My computer at home is win98OEM
original release/K62-500/160MB/6GB. No numbers on moz from that one,
but I can provide them if you want.
Justin H.
--
"Does anybody know any good lawyer jokes?"
-Bill Gates
