In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>JTK wrote:
>>
>> "Justin H." wrote:
[snip]
>> > So obviously there's other factors besides just Mozilla's mem usage.
>>
>> Obviously. What are they?
>
>I don't know. It's your computer, you tell us.
>
Unless my sarcasm meter is faulty, you imply below ("Or did you already know
that?") that my numbers may have been less than "uncooked". To make such an
implication, I would think you'd have to have some idea what these "other
factors" might be.
You claim to not know. Ok, let me postulate then: what OS are you on? How
much memory do you have? I'm Why2K, PIII-933/256MB/40GB. Numbers coming
from Why2K's Task Manager. Now show me yers.
>> > Or
>> > did you already know that?
>> >
>>
>> Why are you posting this with Communicator 4.77, Justin?
>
>Because I don't have the time or the energy to do more than sporadic
>testing of Moz/N6 here at work. I wish that wasn't so, but this is
>work. That, and I prefer Comm's newsreader still. Oh, and the profile
>converter isn't that good at bringing across Communicator profiles.
>
Sounds exactly like what I'm doing. So you must agree with me when I say
Mozilla is not suitable for regular use, and most assuredly not for regular
users.
>By the way, my choice of newsreader doesn't imply any kind of criticism
It states unequivocally that you don't think the Mozilla newsreader is
suitable for normal use. I'd consider that criticism, valid and constructive
at that.
>or any less enthusiasm for the Mozilla project.
That'll pass, I assure you.
> If it worked better for
>me, I'd choose Xnews or Agent, or any one of several good newsreaders.
>I just happen to like Communicator.
Me too.
----- Posted via NewsOne.Net: Free (anonymous) Usenet News via the Web -----
http://newsone.net/ -- Free reading and anonymous posting to 60,000+ groups
NewsOne.Net prohibits users from posting spam. If this or other posts
made through NewsOne.Net violate posting guidelines, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
