Matthew Thomas wrote:
>
> Why bother? The main reason is blatantly obvious in both cases.
>
> In Netscape's case, it's because they haven't yet released a version
> which could seriously be accused (by anyone other than the Netscape
> Marketing people) of being release quality.
>
> And in the Mozilla Organization's case, it's because they haven't yet
> released a version which could seriously be accused (by anyone other
> than the Mozillazine people) of being release quality.
>
> ('Course, there are other significant reasons, but that's the main one.)
>
> --
> Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla UI Design component default assignee thing
> <http://mozilla.org/>
Do you think that Netscape's releases are going to hurt themselves? That
is to say that users will tire of trying each new Netscape release to
see if it is finally the one that is of release quality?
--
Jerry Baker
"The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well." - Joe
Ancis
PGP Key: http://keyserver.pgp.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x48D96D45
======================================================================
SOFTWARE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-=| LAME MP3 ENCODER |=-
LAME Binaries: http://www.jerrybaker.org/lame/
-=| APACHE 2.0 WEB SERVER (WIN32) |=-
Apache 2.0 Installer: http://www.jerrybaker.org/apache/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
