Henri Sivonen wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Jahn > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -N6/6.01 were bug-ridden nightmares, especially Mail and News > > -Mail & News still not performing at reliable levels > > Did tying the browser and the mail&news client together made sense in > the first place? No. I wonder where that idea came from originally. > Does it make sense now? > Only in a pathological sense: Can you imagine how much of a load MozillaBrowserOnly + MozillaNewsReaderOnly would place on the system, when MozillaCombinedBrowserAndNewsreader is already so far beyond the pale? Lordy, we'd all need liquid cooled CPUs!
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Pratik
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Jerry Baker
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage JTK
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage hume . spamfilter
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Mark Anderson
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Magnus Stenman
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage hume . spamfilter
