Jonas J�rgensen wrote:
> 
> Asa Dotzler wrote:
> > That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should
> > be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex
> > Communicator, HallZilla, etc.  Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing
> > and development purposes. It's fine with me if users go with Netscape
> > 6.x instead of Mozilla because they consider 6.x to be newer and better
> > than 1.0.  A Netscape release gets the user agent out there just as well
> > (maybe even better with commercial support and additional features like
> > IM) as a Mozilla binary :)
> 
> Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some point going to be a
> browser for regular users as well?

At the rate things are going, the short answer is "yes, it will be like
this forever".  What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
"Mozilla isn't for users!", Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the "Mozila for end users".

Reply via email to