Christian Mattar wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> JTK wrote:
> 
> > > Now,
> > > if we're talking SECONDS that may be a different matter. Who gives a
> > > ratsazz if one is 2 ms faster than the other ??? And besides, in order
> > > to post a true value you have to run these so-called speed tests in a
> > > sterile medium without the benefit of congestion/connection anomalies.
> > > What's 'faster' in one venue can be slower in another but we're still
> > > talking milliseconds. BAH !! Nothing but marketing hype.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm.  I must be getting old.  Back in my day, if we wanted to compete
> > with a competitor, instead of a litiniy of excuses, we simply produced a
> > better product.  Or at least one with equal performance.
> 
> Well, that's sooo yesterday.

I told you I was getting old ;-).

> Today, you just bundle it with the OS...
>

Right: Microsoft bundles a better product with the OS, so Mozilla's got
two knocks against it.
 
> Christian

Reply via email to