This looks and smells like a troll, but...
Al Rider wrote:
> Text insert caret placement is terribly annoying. It is aligned with
> the trailing edge of the character just keyed, rather than at the
> location for the next character to be keyed. {yes, I reported this bug
What's the difference? At least it's not a horrid _ or block cursor.
I've never had trouble with the | after the textx I type.
> ActiveX wrapper is broken. I bugzilla reported it last summer.
ActiveX=M$ and Windoze only. Mozilla is cross platform.
> Oh please don't remind me of NS6x. I have better things to do with my
> time than play with all the AOL ads and pop-ups, etc.
I never saw an add for AOL when I tried NS6x. But I use mozilla.
> It's terrific that Mozilla complies faithfully to W3C standards; but so
> what. Web designers [for the internet] are forced to make their stuff
> conform to IE5.5 and IE6 anyhow.
Why? They should conform to the HTML standard, and tell the users
to get a working browser. They should also not *require* a certian
browser to view a site. Give a notice, but show the content.
I've not done business with companies because I couldn't access their
site. I browse with Netscape and Mozilla on Linux, Solaris, and HP-UX.
Ifg the site says I must use Windoze and or IE, I go somewhere else
after sending the webmaster email eplaining why I won't be returning.
> What's the current bug number? 114K + and counting. Doesn't take much
> math skill to figure out the bugs will never be reduced to a reasonable
> amount.
>
> For every 100 bugs they fix, they introduce 80 new ones.
You don't make sense here. You saw the bugs don't go down,
then give a decreasing formula that will reach 0 someday.
-Thomas
