I just read this in part 7 of the GPL (part 11 of the LGPL). It seems to say that it is not possible to distribute LAME under either license: "... For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program." -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Frederick Page
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Mike Oliphant
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Frederick Page
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again... Nils Faerber
