Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again...

[Greg Maxwell]

On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Mark Taylor wrote:

> "... For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free
> redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly
> or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it
> and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the
> Program."

I disagree, since none of us are patent lawers, none of us (as US law
states) can know that it's under a patent. Acording to US law, only a
patent lawer can know that something is patented.

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )