Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME license, once again...

[Frederick Page]

Hi Greg,

you wrote on Sat, Oct 16 1999:

>You said yourself "They have a bad encoder that is coupled via DLL
>into their program"..  Sounds like they dont want to spend the $$ on
>a good encoder, so they want to use lame to enhance their product.

I have the same feeling about this. What I don't understand: there are
zillions of front-ends for encoders, I don't understand, what makes
this particular program so unique, that it can't be GPL'd.

Just my $0.02 ...

Kind regards   Frederick


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )