Unfortunately I'm running Windows rather than Linux. I will take that plunge once it is more configuration user-friendly. The -V4 switch in v3.57 (without -v which doesn't appear to be required). I noticed that prior Lame versions required -V5 to average close to 128kb/s whereas -V4 is now closer. I notice also that silence appears to be encoding at 64kb/s rather than 32 as specified, whereas Xing VBR (normal) encodes it at 48kb/s. The major factor which concerned me was a frequency analysis I performed on a song encoded with -V5 (v3.57) which averaged around 112kb/s. It did not show anything over 16khz. I realise that without the -k option that bitrates below 128 are cut at 16khz but surely with VBR there should be higher bit-rates and so higher freqencies. Ross. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] BladeEnc vs. LAME at high bitrat... Mikhail
- [MP3 ENCODER] www.mp3tech.org Jason Antony
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] www.mp3tech.org Acy Stapp
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] www.mp3tech.org Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] www.mp3tech.org DeRobertis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] www.mp3tech.org Edward S. Marshall
- [MP3 ENCODER] VBR not as vari... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR not as ... Leonardo Stern
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not as ... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not... Ampex
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: VBR not... Ross Levis
- [MP3 ENCODER] New switch want... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] New switch ... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] New switch ... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] New switch ... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] New switch ... DeRobertis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] BladeEnc vs. LAME at high bitrates Ambrose Feinstein